Category: Revolution of God

The Revolution of God 3: Depth

Depth
Felt like it was about time to get another post done in this little experiment to try a blog series – been a little quiet over the last week trying to get to grips again with the Lab and college and everything, but I think everything is beginning to sort itself out now.

The aim was to reflect a little on some of the values that should be represented by the Kingdom of God, using Brian McLaren’s imagery of a revolution. So following on from contrasting Brokenness in my first post and, last time, Wholeness, this time I wanted to think about Depth.

Authenticity, being real and being genuine is something that I’ve been reflecting on a lot recently, and a little on the blog. So, for this post, I wanted to come at it from a different angle and try and explore the whole concept in terms of depth.

We seem to live in a bizarre world which on one hand is pursuing something deep and meaningful, but at the same time strangely embraces shallowness. And so we hold up this ideal of pursuing the deepness of relationship and existence, but at the same time are obsessed with paddling around in the shallows. We find ourselves struggling on one hand between the genuine and genuine reliability – and all the shallow images of perfect looking men and women, and Western consumerism.

And so this God revolution needs to pursue the hidden depths. We need to pursue depth in the world around us – to be committed to looking not just at the obvious but also below the surface. We need to pursue deep, real relationships with the people around us – relationships which are without agenda. And we need to allow others to see our hidden depths and not to hide them below the surface of what we want people to see.

Having a depth that stands up to examination doesn’t mean being perfect. It means being real – and to move away from the shame that stops us from revealing what lies within. It’s about being open – and allowing ourselves to be accountable.

Hope that makes some sense…

The Revolution of God 2: Wholeness

Bighands
In the last post, I reflected on brokenness as a defining characteristic of humanity, and so therefore also of this revolutionary way of living that Jesus presented/presents to us when he talks about the Kingdom of God. I know that there are lots of questions I left unanswered in my extremely realist description of humanity – like what’s the point of even living our livers at all if we aren’t to aim for perfection? And so in discussing the other side of the coin – Wholeness – I’d like to try and kind of marry up the two and try and explore how this Godly Revolution can be characterised by both brokenness – broken people, sin, that "something’s missing" feeling – and by wholeness – being whole, fulfilled, complete in Jesus.

Like a kind of strange post-modern paradox.

I think that in exploring wholeness, and where that wholeness comes from for us as Jesus followers, we need to talk about hope. For me, this sense of being whole, being complete, is about the future – abouty being fulfilled in Christ in a day and a time yet to come – but also something we can be assured of and certain of. On that day, God will reconcile all things to himself.

And so, it is this hope and the faith that sustains it which form the connection between us, here in the present – our broken, imperfect selves – and this wholeness which we are assured of. Somehow, through faith and hope, this wholeness becomes not only true for the future – but also part of our present. Hey, that sounds quite cool ;-)

In my recent first meeting with my big boss (well, under Yahweh I guess), Bishop Dominic of Monmouth he talked about hope as the "unique selling point" of the church in marketing terms. Plenty of different crazy things in this day and age can offer you purpose, can offer you acceptance, can offer you love – and plenty of them can even do a pretty good job of being genuine about it, and can give you a relatively good return on your investment. But if C.S. Lewis is right and Christianity is of infinite importance, then only following Jesus can give you real, authentic hope.

Think I went off-track a little there… So anyway, hope seems to be this strange "thing" which forms a bridge between our present brokeness and future wholeness – we can realise that wholeness now, but only by faith through hope.

So perhaps it shouldn’t be wholeness that is a characteristic of the God revolution – but actually the pursuit of wholeness. We need to be striving for Christ, who is our hope of future glory, future wholeness.

Hopefully that made some sense – took me a couple of days to get round to finishing after my family arrived back from visiting relatives again and with packing and travelling back to Newport. Just arrived back this afternoon ready for a busy day tomorrow. :-)

The Revolution of God 1: Brokenness

 40799630 che203  2 The Revolution of God 1: Brokenness  Been thinking about doing a blog series for a while – so with a few days to spare before I get back to Newport and the Lab again for the New Year I thought I’d give it a little try and see what happens. Having said that, bear with me – I discovered our old Super Nintendo again today after about 10 years so I’ve got a bit of a Mario hangover… feeling a little spaced out ;-)

In the A New Kind of Christian series of books, through the character Neo the author, Brian McLaren suggests that perhaps a better expression for today than the "Kingdom of God" which Jesus talked about, would be to use the imagery of a "Revolution of God". A new, revolutionary way of life, a subversion of the destructive systems in society today. A Revolution of followers – disciples – who will give anything and everything to pursue “life in all its fullness”.

Using that revolution imagery, the question I want to set myself for this series is what that revolution would look like – what values would it be characterised by? And what values are there that it’s possible we could miss at a first glance? So this isn’t an attempt to make some kind of exhaustive list, but instead to try and challenge with something a bit different. Having said that, I think that none of the five values I’ve chosen (at least to start with) are new to the church – but perhaps they haven’t quite been put in this context before – I don’t know.

So, first, I thought of brokenness.

It isn’t hard to show that brokenness is a big part of the world. Just look out the window, or take your earphones out next time you’re walking the street – brokenness, broken people – that something wrong, something missing feeling – is everywhere. But how does this imperfectness, this wrong, missing feeling figure in with the perfect Jesus revolution?

Well, I guess, first and foremost, its part of us. Brokenness, sin, whatever you want to call it – that thing that stops us from having full lives – is the overwhelming, uniform, uniting characteristic which the whole of humanity – and the whole church – has in common. The church is a testament to how great our God is purely in that it somehow holds a group of broken, hurting, jealous, vengeful people together. So let’s not ignore it or strive fruitlessly to get rid of it – let’s accept it.

A time will come when the kingdom of God will come in all its fullness – when the revolution will reach its height and cease to be a revolution altogether – it will just be the way we live. But until then, we need to learn to live with our brokenness and allow God to work through it – and also in it.

Once we’ve accepted and learned to live with the broken state we are in – and we need to accept it, both as people, but also as the church we need to accept that whatever our mission was, whatever it is, we’ve already failed at it on our own…. Anyway, once we’ve accepted it we need to be working with it, through it and in it. We need to be actively working to put the pieces back together – to help with God’s work in helping to be the sticky tape which holds people together. And I don’t just mean putting people back together spiritually – both emotionally and, possibly most important, physically – as suggested by psychology. But more on that kind of thing later on I think.

We also need to recognise that the people we are working with – our partners in the revolution – are also broken people. And, most importantly, that we ourselves are and that this affects the way in which the revolution will flow. So let’s not unrealistically expect each other to be perfect and sinless – and let’s not have exaggerated views of ourselves and our own abilities. Instead let’s learn to live with each other – love each other as Christ taught us – in spite of, and including our broken parts. Because this is a true and trustworthy saying – Jesus Christ came to save sinners – broken people of whom I am the worst.

Imagine a group of soldiers, limping, injured, desperate – a platoon who realistically should have already failed, but who, by supporting each other, carrying each other, propping each other up, are somehow still moving – somehow still fighting. That’s what this revolution looks like – an army of walking wounded. And Jesus would have it no other way – this way we know that every small victory we take, every extra distance covered – it’s all down to Him. Thank God.

Okay, I think I’m done for today – thank you so much if you had the patience to read through all that – and as always I’m sure it’s not a perfect argument. Next the other side of the coin: Wholeness.