Why faith-based youth work offers a solution to the London Riots
Youthwork Magazine editor, Martin Saunders, wrote this piece in the Guardian looking at the London Riots from the perspective of a Christian youth worker:
Faith-based youth work has something special, something inherently different to offer them, because it offers something distinctive: transformation. And we in the faith community must not be ashamed of where that transformation comes from: an engagement with young people’s yearning sense of spirituality – something which promises rewards even greater than financial gain.
Experimental Youth Work in Hull
Thanks to Jonny for pointing out this video, showing some of the incredible work at Hull Youth for Christ, supported by Church Urban Fund. Over the last couple of years, I’ve increasingly become aware of CUF and how amazing they are - unfortunately though they only fund projects in England, not here in Wales.
I have friends who have visited Hull YFC and been very impressed with their work and the way the team there live their lives in such an open way to the community around them. I loved seeing pictures of the breakfast club they run - a great, really simple idea.
Those of you involved in youth work, or even just wanting to live for Jesus in your community - how could you change the lives of young people in your area by supporting their whole families?
Found this clip from King of the Hill really interesting.
Is the problem that Jesus was too packaged-up with youth cultural baggage, or that the Dad wasn’t willing to accept a kind of Christianity because the culture around it was too alien to him?
What do you think? Was there a need for less contextualisation/inculturation or more tolerance of a different culture?
Thanks Rethinking Youth Ministry for the clip.
As a postscript: Does the church lose young people when they grow up because they grow out of the cultural fads that we’ve wrapped Jesus up in in trying to reach them, or because we fail to fully contextualise the gospel in a way that makes sense for their own culture?
The Alway Project - Annual Report 2011
A few weeks ago, we threw together our annual report for the project in Alway over the past year. You can view it here to see the different work we’ve been involved in.
Also, in the last few days we have properly formalised a partnership with the Streetspace Network - a network of innovative youth and community work projects run by Frontier Youth Trust in partnership with the Church Missionary Society.
We’re very excited about the incredible support and training that partnering with Streetspace will bring to the work in Alway.
Child worker checks to be reduced, say ministers - BBC News
Another update on what is going to happen regarding CRB checks and the Independent Safeguarding Authority which was planned by Labour but put on hold by the Tories.
Introducing the Chemo - Teen Sub-Culture Hybrid?

In our local secondary school yesterday, one of the young people we were chatting to described themselves using the label “Chemo” - meaning half Chav and half Emo.
Urban Dictionary describes the Chemo as:
A hybrid of the classic stereotypes “Chav” and “Emo” When mixed together you get a “Chemo” a “Chav” who dresses like an “emo” but still has “Chav” tendancies.
…
The most common type of chemo tends to listen to ‘emo music’ such as MCR and Fallout Boy, but still dress chavy. (longsdale hoodies, trackies ect…)
It’s interesting, but I guess inevitable that hybrids of different teen sub-culture groups have developed (see also Choth, Swemo and Changsta).
An increasingly individualised culture must mean that individuals are increasingly unwilling or unable to be sorted into sub-cultural groups. These groups, sometimes called homogeneous units, seem to me to be becoming heterogeneous and teenagers seem to be increasingly willing to create close friendship groups which are made of people from across different social groups.
Some questions:
- Are sub-cultures and stereotypes the same thing?
- Does an increase in the number of youth sub-cultures inevitably mean that there will be too many variants for it to be worth studying them as groupings? (Is the Homogeneous Unit Principle obsolete?)
- Do all the members of a sub-culture have to be a perfect fit for it to be worth understanding that culture as a group, rather than as a group of individuals?
Any thoughts?
Teen Role Models: Who They Are, Why They Matter
Teenagers’ preferences and tastes greatly influence America’s cultural identity. The people teenagers look up to as their role models matter a great deal in determining the shape and substance of the next generation of churchgoers, consumers and citizens. A study conducted by Barna Group among a national sample of teenagers gives new insight into whom teens select as their role models and why those individuals captured their attention
…
The “Who”
So who do teenagers name as their role models? Even while limiting the answers to non-parents, family members still comes out on top. The most commonly mentioned role model is a relative—37% of teens named a relation other than their parent as the person they admire most. This is typically a grandparent, but also includes sisters, brothers, cousins, aunts, and uncles.
After “family,” teens mention teachers and coaches (11%), friends (9%), and pastors or other religious leaders they know personally (6%). Notice that a majority of teens indicated that the people they most admire and imitate are those with whom they maintain a personal connection, friendship, or interaction.
Beyond the realm of the people they know personally, entertainers (including musicians and actors) were named by 6% of teens, followed by sports heroes (5%), political leaders (4%), faith leaders (4%), business leaders (1%), authors (1%), science and medical professionals (1%), other artists (1%), and members of the military (1%).
The high-profile leaders most commonly named were President Obama (3%) and Jesus Christ (3%). Other “celebrities” mentioned by multiple teenagers in the study included entertainers Tyra Banks, Rob Dyrdrek, Lady Gaga, Demi Lovato, Paul McCartney, Taylor Swift, Steven Spielberg and Oprah Winfrey. The only athletes who earned multiple mentions were LeBron James, Peyton Manning, Michael Phelps, Mike Tyson and David Wright. In the spiritual domain, besides Jesus, teens were most likely to admire Mahatma Gandhi and the Pope. Social and business leaders garnering teen attention included Walt Disney, Bill Gates, and Martin Luther King, Jr. The writers who captured the imagination of teens included Yumi Tamura (Japanese Manga artist) and Alan Moore (English comic book writer).
…
The “Why”
Respondents described a wide range of reasons why they named a particular role model. The most common rationale (26%) was the personality traits of that person (e.g., caring about others, being loving and polite, being courageous, and being fun were some of the characteristics mentioned most often). Another factor in teens’ thinking was finding someone to emulate (22%) or that the teen would like to “follow in the footsteps” of their chosen role model.
…
What it Says
David Kinnaman, who is president of the Barna Group, offered four insights about the current mindset of teenagers based on the findings:
1. For better and worse, teens are emulating the people they know best. More than two out of three teens identify people they know personally as their primary role model. Many parents and youthworkers fret about the role models of the next generation. Yet, one reason to remain hopeful about the development of young people is their reliance upon the people they know best: friends, relatives, teachers, pastors, and coaches. At the same time, that reality underscores the insistence of many parents that they influence the people with whom their child associates, in order to be sure that their kids are surrounded by people modeling positive values and life choices.
2. Teenagers’ role models reveal that teens want to get ahead, accomplish goals, overcome obstacles… and be encouraged along the way. For all the talk about the social consciousness of the next generation, their role models are rarely selected because of a person’s service or sacrifice for others. Young people, like most other Americans, choose their role models because those people are achievers and because they help teenagers feel better about themselves. None of these aspirations is necessarily misguided, but the focus tends to be uniquely American: on tasks and self, rather than on God and others.
3. Spirituality is only of modest concern to the aspirations of most teens. Teens rarely identified spiritual mentors. Moreover, few teens consider issues of faith, religion or morality when deciding whom they will try to emulate. Even among young Christians, their role models are virtually no different than other teenagers. (The only exception is an expected outcome: those teens actively involved in a church are slightly more likely to identify a spiritual or faith leader as one of their models.) While other Barna research shows that teens are active spiritually, that behavior generally does not influence the “who” and the “why” of teens’ role models.
4. Outside of their personal relationships, teen role models reflect a broadening mindset. The next generation selects its heroes from a wide spectrum of both people discovered through both the global stage and micro-niches. The menu of celebrities crosses multiple sectors, ranging from skateboarders and MTV hosts to international graphic novel artists, scholars, social innovators and historic leaders; from teen idols to celebrities who came of age in the 1960s. The eclectic nature of the role models they embrace is not new but the diversity of pools from which they choose those models is atypical. Their choices are substantially affected by media imagery and exposure.
When we take the time to see and hear young people, most often we find compassion rising within us. When we see with the eyes of Jesus and hear with the ears of Jesus, we soon find ourselves feeling with the heart of Jesus… When we seek to be present to young people, we not only see and hear them, we also seek to let down the walls of our heart and allow ourselves to be moved by them. As ministers with youth, we seek to have soft hearts, hearts that can be touched by the joy, confusion, loneliness, anger or tears of young people.
Safeguarding and Every Child Matters are no longer preferred terminology
If you’ve just changed the name of your child protection policy to a “safeguarding policy”, and if your youth work curriculum now references the 5 Every Child Matters outcomes - then go back and press the undo button!
But don’t worry, the LibCon government is committed to Child Protection and Helping Children Achieve More.
CYPNow has announced that, according to an internal memo within the Department of Education, the old ‘preferred’ terms under Labour are out - and good old fashioned family values are in…
Here the list:
LANGUAGE OF THE NEW GOVERNMENT: SOME OF THE CHANGES AS THEY APPEAR IN THE MEMOPre-11 May 2010 England will be the best place in the world for children to grow up
Post-11 May 2010 Make Britain the most family-friendly place in Europe
Pre-11 May 2010 Targeted services
Post-11 May 2010 Fairer services
Pre-11 May 2010 Targets and outcomes
Post-11 May 2010 Results and impact
Pre-11 May 2010 Children’s trusts
Post-11 May 2010 Local areas, better, fairer services
Pre-11 May 2010 One children’s workforce framework/tool
Post-11 May 2010 Local areas self-assessment tool
Pre-11 May 2010 Five outcomes/ECM
Post-11 May 2010 Help children achieve more
Pre-11 May 2010 Narrow the gap
Post-11 May 2010 Close the gap, vulnerable and disadvantaged
Pre-11 May 2010 Integrated working
Post-11 May 2010 People working better to provide better services
Pre-11 May 2010 Safeguarding
Post-11 May 2010 Child protection
Pre-11 May 2010 FIP
Post-11 May 2010 Key workers providing intensive support to families
HT: Ian
